-
Learn more about how logging increases forest fire hazard by exploring the documents and links below. Please share what you know about clearcut logging and forest fire hazard in the forum.
-
Recently posted
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
(2023) Nonstationary stochastic paired watershed approach: Investigating forest harvesting effects on floods in two large, nested, and snow-dominated watersheds in British Columbia, Canada
Excellent story by Stefan Labbé on this vitally important research by Johnson and Alila. -
-
-
-
4
Do new forests or old ones capture more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere?
No. Primary and old forests are being replaced with managed forests. The logging industry plans to cut those managed forests (Langford) long before the carbon density becomes anywhere near what it was in an old forest (Vancouver). Those plantations will never become a Vancouver, let alone a New Delhi or Tokyo. If the logging industry continues to hold sway in BC, managed "forests" will toggle between Lytton and Langford until it's too hot and dry for forests to grow. Then they will become grasslands (Regina). -
4
Do new forests or old ones capture more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere?
Would not Vancouver be replaced by a more expansive population rivaling Delhi or Tokyo per square meter? The absolute density of sequestering forest would be a magnitude higher would it not? -
-
3
Submission to the Sunshine Coast TSA timber supply review
David Shipway shared the response he received from Jillian Tougas: SCNRD_David_Shipway_Response.pdf -
-
